Skip to content
Briefing

China’s space economy finds its centre of gravity. Will the global space industry feel the pull?

China’s space strategy has shifted. The 15th Five-Year Plan moves beyond capability-building to a centralised, fully integrated ecosystem, positioning the commercial space sector at the centre of national strategy as a pillar of industrial policy.

The sector leader, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), recently revealed its roadmap translating this mandate into 2030 deliverables: operational space tourism, space digital infrastructure, space resource development and space traffic management.

This briefing examines China’s approach and what it could mean for the space domain globally.

The plan

China’s 15th 5-year Plan (the Plan) was formally approved by the National People’s Congress in March 2026 following annual political sessions in Beijing. The Plan outlines the country’s core objectives and recommendations for economic and social development between 2026 and 2030. It is designed to modernise the Chinese economy and forecasts strategic upgrades in several key industries including new energies, new materials and aerospace.

Whilst the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025) focused on achieving breakthroughs, the 15th shifts emphasis to integration. For the Chinese space industry, this means moving from building individual capabilities to weaving them into a fully functioning space economy.

By 2030, China aims to transform its space industry from a series of state-directed programs into a centralised, self-sustaining ecosystem in which capabilities and capital are strategically aligned. This integrated system is intended to bring commercial innovation, scientific research and national strategy into close convergence, strengthening the sector’s role as a driver of advanced economic growth.

To execute this shift, China places commercial space at the heart of its strategy. It has appointed its main state-owned contractor, the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), as sector lead, the “chain leader” (链长), tasked to oversee the integration of the commercial space sector into the centralised framework and drive the transition from a mission-oriented to a systemic industry.

The Space+ roadmap

On 29 January 2026, the CASC unveiled its commercial space execution roadmap, “Space+”, targeting the promotion and development of four key domains: space tourism, space digital infrastructure, space resource development and space traffic management.

Among other, CASC commits to achieving operational suborbital tourism, including a clear operational framework, enabling on-orbit data processing, launching asteroid prospecting studies and developing active debris removal technologies, all by 2030.

Through these commercial capabilities, the CASC will play a key role in fostering the necessary advancements for China’s broader objectives, including the formulation of international space traffic management rules.

Market integration

China’s strategy represents a fundamental shift in space governance by carving out a substantial role for the commercial space sector.

This reform seeks to integrate the full spectrum of commercial activity, from established contractors to dynamic and disruptive NewSpace companies, within the national space policy. China is effectively repositioning space from a “national cause” to a “market industry”, scaling its traditional programme-based model into a structured industrial system.

This integration strategy has been applied before. China’s high-speed rail and electric vehicle sectors developed under a similar format including state-orchestrated consolidation, controlled market opening, and integration of private capability into national infrastructure.

The Plan mandates a tiered structure under which state projects create commercial opportunities, and commercial progress feeds back into national capability.

Why it matters

This vision of vertical integration sharply contrasts with Western space governance models and the global space industry generally, where the decentralisation of operations is characteristic: decision-making authority, funding, and operational control are dispersed across multiple independent actors, public and private. Although it drives competition, it also creates sector fragmentation between public institutions, regulatory frameworks and commercial operators.

Space debris mitigation and space tourism illustrate the commercial costs of this fragmentation:

  • On debris, the absence of binding disposal standards and a predictable liability framework leaves operators unable to quantify risk, and the growing threat of congestion unaddressed.
  • On space tourism, which includes suborbital flights and orbital habitats, regulatory vacuums persist in core areas including passenger safety, vehicle certification and liability allocation, leaving risks undefined, thus unfavourable to insurance, and investment deterred by uncertainty.

Commercial frictions arise due to uncertainty, prohibitive insurance coverage and stalled investment, each compounding the next.

Global implications

China’s pursuit of an integrated space economy could reshape the space domain globally. Whilst this centralised model may not be fully replicable, its implementation might stimulate new developments elsewhere and provide mechanisms to address industry fragmentation. Clearer liability frameworks, binding technical standards and coordinated orbital traffic management are not uniquely Chinese aspirations, quite the contrary.

As the Chinese space economy undergoes reform, commercial operators might find a more reliable competitive landscape, improved access to capital and the stability of state-backed procurement pipelines.

Structured operational frameworks defining responsibilities and binding standards should introduce greater predictability, enable reliable risk assessment and clarify liability. This would create more favourable conditions for investment and insurance, allowing insurers to diversify their products, reduce investor risk and support operational viability.

Seen from this angle, China’s strategy could influence the evolution of the global space industry far beyond its borders.

Research undertaken by Lesley Liu, Trainee Solicitor.

Published
01 April 2026
Reading Time
6 minutes