authors
Court of Appeal Reaffirms Approach to Conflicts Between Specific and General Terms
Briefing
25 May 2021
2 MIN READ
3 AUTHORS
The appeal in Septo Trading Inc v Tintrade Limited focused on the correct approach to take where an incorporated, standard term is alleged to conflict or to be inconsistent with a term expressly agreed between the parties.
Download Briefing
Download a PDF version of ‘Court of Appeal Reaffirms Approach to Conflicts Between Specific and General Terms’
Related Insights
Briefing
Freedom of contract – free of activism: Trends in contractual interpretation emerging from recent UK supreme court judgements
Briefing
Developments in sanctions and the law of unintended consequences
Briefing
The growth of sustainability regulation: new swiss sustainability rules – what commodities need to know
Briefing
Fraud, Bribery and Corruption charges can cause more damage than reputational damage. How can you make sure your business stays out of headlines?
RELATED INSIGHTS
Briefing
Freedom of contract – free of activism: Trends in contractual interpretation emerging from recent UK supreme court judgements
During 2024, the UK’s highest court, the Supreme Court, has demonstrated continued judicial fidelity to the parties’ agreement and a determination
Read more
Briefing
Developments in sanctions and the law of unintended consequences
Sanctions are a powerful tool in international relations which have been increasingly used by governments and supra-national bodies …
Read more
Briefing
The growth of sustainability regulation: new swiss sustainability rules – what commodities need to know
As the commodity sector grapples with increasing demands for sustainability information from regulators, banks and consumers …
Read more